Rinnova Convinzioni

• Quote

• Quote

> Se la metto nella zona pubblica dovrei anche rispondere a 40 messaggi che mi chiedono di cosa sto parlando. perche dici questo? ogni messaggio che hai scritto ha forse ricevuto 40 messaggi che ti chiedono di cosa stai parlando? NON potrebbe essere qualcuno lo sappia già oppure cerchi su internet?
> Se lo si spiega in pubblico salterà fuori un casino clamoroso. cosa intendi per casino clamoroso? mi stai dicendo che ogni volta che si spiega qualche tecnica di pubblico dominio ( o facilemente recuperabile su libri ed internet) salta fuori un casino clamoroso?? come poter imparare dal casino clamoroso che nascerebbe?
> Se mi stai dicendo che tu fai l’esercizio solo in pubblico allora proponilo tu e spiegalo tu a tutti quanti i curiosi. Potrei quasi quasi farlo anche telepaticamente? che dici? mi capita spesso che mi leggano nella mente ( mind reading) magari oltre che spedire riesco a ricevere i messaggi….
> Se non riesco a convincere te, figurarsi a convincere gli altri… non devi con-VINCERE nessuno, ho già accettato la tua proposta settimane fa, ancora non sono stato chiaro e ti chiedo venia, proviamo in un altro modo POSTA STA CAZZO DI CONVINZIONE 🙂
> Se il nonno di Paris Hilton aveva 6 palle allora era un flipper. la nipote del nonno di paris di palle ne ha viste tante da fare una salagiochi.
> Questa ovviamente è solo la mia negativa visione del mondo dalla quale è meglio se non vi fate contagiare  > (tra l’altro piena di condizionali)!
… e di generalizzazioni, mind reading distorisioni, equivalenze…
> Il prossimo tuo è sempre un essere meraviglioso e pieno di voglia di fare. :p. con fare intendi SCOPARE? ..allora non sono io 🙂
rt
> PS: per vernon, prima provo ad accordarmi con rotello se non riesco poi lo facciamo noi due.
rotello è d accordo, rotello crede che si possa fare anche in 3-4 persone, rotello è sicuro di non aver ancora avuto nessuna convinzione da cambiare.
comuqnue se googli:
wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleight_of_mouth
qui invece: http://www.sleight-of-mouth.com/

• 1) Meta frame – This is perfect pattern to demolish objections!
• 2) Reality Strategy – Use it on the “I cannot _______ because _______: type objections.
• 3) Model of the World – this one is bulletproof; there is NO way to lose.
• 4) Apply to Self – this one is not only one of the most effective reframes you’ll ever have the pleasure of using, it’s a lot of fun too!
• 5) Change Frame Size – Let ‘er rip with this one.
• 6) Hierarchy of Criteria – this is one you will be using the first day!
• 7) Consequence – this is a powerful change maker.
• Another Outcome – this is known as the politician’s favorite. It may become yours too!
• 9) Metaphor – draw on the muscle of this one and people will melt in your path.
• 10) Redefine – this one can have massive impact.
• 11) Chunk Down – used for even your most difficult situations.
• 12) Chunk up – this will be a valuable tool you can use daily.
• 13) Counter Example – this is a fun strategy that is awesome!
• 14) Intent – this is a favorite and is used to combat the most brutal self-limiting beliefs.

in italiano: I veri Master Practitioner sono maestri del linguaggio, capaci di creare cambiamento, di influenzare, persuadere e comunicare con grande efficacia. Il training include:

• A) Sleight of Mouth Gli Sleight of Mouth sono una maniera di modificare credenze limitanti ed affermazioni di vario tipo. Sono metodi conversazionali ristrutturanti con i quali possiamo: 1) interrompere stati emozionali 2) creare nuove rappresentazioni interiori nella mente di chi ci ascolta 3) eliminare velocemente credenze Nel corso vengono proposte le piu’ recenti ricerche al riguardo e utili aggiunte operate dalla nostra scuola.
• B) Ristrutturare: la struttura del significato. Il concetto di ristrutturazione è alla base della PNL stessa. Ristrutturando efficacemente possiamo cambiare la percezione del nostro interlocutore.
• C) Modelli di Polya: Perché crediamo a qualcosa? I modelli di Polya sono una serie di modelli che spiegano la maniera con la quale crediamo a qualcosa.
• D) Esplorazioni cartesiane: essenzialmente il concetto di calculus ampliato successivamente nel Quantum Linguistics.

What’s Really Keeping S Trapped?
S sounds like he’s trapped in a ‘double-bind’ belief; he’s damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t. When someone is caught in a double bind, it can be very hard to change his beliefs because he’ll use everything, even evidence to the contrary, to reinforce his beliefs.
Richard Bandler, co-founder of NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming), likes to tell the story of a mental patient who kept insisting that he was a living corpse. Hitting upon a bright idea, a doctor asked him; ‘do corpses bleed then?’
The patient replied; ‘of course not!’ The doctor promptly pricked him, and when the patient saw blood dripping out of his wound he exclaimed; ‘well I’ll be damned – corpses do bleed!’ How Beliefs Turn into Thought Viruses
NLP developer Robert Dilts explains double binds in his ground-breaking book Sleight of Mouth: The Magic of Conversational Belief Change. In NLP we say that the map is not the territory – our beliefs about reality is not reality itself.
Healthy beliefs exist in an eco-system; they’re linked in a cycle to our internal states, values, experiences and expectations. And so they can change according to our inner states and outer environment.
The Structure of Beliefs Adapted from a diagram in Robert Dilts’ book Sleight of Mouth.
According to Dilts, beliefs become ‘thought viruses’ when they’re cut off from this cycle. A belief, disconnected to internal and external feedback, then feeds upon itself – and change becomes difficult because it refuses to ‘listen’ to anyone but itself.
The Structure of Thought Viruses Adapted from a diagram in Robert Dilts’ book Sleight of Mouth.
This leads to all sorts of problems because the belief becomes a circular argument and double-bind…like a Catch-22. In the classic novel ‘Catch-22’ (which is hilarious by the way), WW II airman Yossarian wants to escape the horrors of war by leaving the air force.
But he can’t, because of regulation ‘Catch-22’. Catch 22 says that if Yossarian can prove himself insane, he can be discharged. But only a sane man would ask to be discharged because no sane man would want to risk his life. So by requesting to be discharged on the grounds that he’s insane, Yossarian proves himself sane and can’t be discharged. It’s a circular argument that Yossarian can’t win. Breaking Out of a Double Bind
Reading Mr Wang’s description of S, it’s obvious that S has caught himself in a double bind. He has no friends, therefore he’s bad and evil. Whomever doesn’t want to make friends with him is also bad and evil. Therefore, everyone is bad and evil.
So how can you help someone who is damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t?
I’ll be honest with you; there aren’t any easy answers to this question. In essence, you’ll want to open up his double bind belief so it’s receptive again to feedback from his internal states, values, experiences and expectations – this makes the belief open to change.
In Dilts’ book Sleight of Mouth he reveals (more than) one way to break down limiting beliefs; applying the belief back onto itself.
For example, if I were working with S; to the belief that everyone is evil, I could say that ‘yes, the world is an evil place…because of evil beliefs like that‘.
There are even more methods, like speaking to his values, chunking his beliefs or conditioning new behaviors. But in a situation as advanced as S’s, change needs time and someone by his side who can get a more comprehensive view of his situation than the internet can give.

• Quote